Try 1x for free
1x is a curated photo gallery where every image have been handpicked for their high quality. With a membership, you can take part in the curation process and also try uploading your own best photos and see if they are good enough to make it all the way.
Right now you get one month for free when signing up for a PRO account. You can cancel anytime without being charged.
Try for free   No thanks
We use cookies
This website uses cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience for the following purposes: to enable basic functionality of the website, to provide a better experience on the website, to measure your interest in our products and services and to personalize marketing interactions.
I agree   I deny
Forum
Photography
Discover yourself
#LANDSCAPE
Marc Adamus
12 years ago
Although my schedule rarely allows me to participate in such activities as online forums, I would like to touch on a number of things I have always enjoyed about the 1x site, and all of them revolve around the refinement of the purest artistic process. For one, this is the most internationally distributed website I visit to share photography, and that brings us a broad scope of different influences and different walks of life from around the globe. Secondly, the curated aspect often brings forth images with more than the basics - Our selection specialists generally do at least one thing I really appreciate, and that's looking for images that tell the story of the subject, the relationship the artist has with the subject, and images that trigger an evocative, often emotional response that delivers the artist's message and/or interpretation. Last, and to the previous point, the work we are privileged to see on this site is the core of essential artistic photography, where most of our contributors have moved pasy the overly cliched approaches to subjects we've all seen, and ideas that have been done to death.
 
Eventually, when you do this for long enough, you reach a point as an artist where you have to evolve or stop. While most of us learn though imitation to some degree at least, the best artists among us stand out for the primary reason that their art is their own. To define and refine one's own style is the highest level, and there are parallels throughout the art world. Take music for example. There are many popular bands with a catchy tune that are all the rage today and you'll have forgotten about a month from now. There are very few Pink Floyd's, however. The later withstands the test of time because of uniqueness of style in their respective medium that connects with their subjects. Photography is the same way. We've all seen a picture of Mesa Arch, for example, about twenty eight million and a half times. No matter how pretty the sunrise, no matter how catchy the tune, it's been done. Art must evolve, and we must evolve as artists. Something of our desire to create, to express, to share and to interpret what we make and create disappears for every time we copy something else.
 
When I make my way around the internet scene and all the photography on display today it is plainly visible that one of the unfortunate side effects of mass-media sharing is that it has created an environment where sharing of images is rarely taken without popularity in consideration. As a professional, I feel it as much as anyone does and if I can post a pretty sunset on 500px that will get ten thousand views or a portrait of a side of a tree that will get a few hundred, I am not compelled to expand much as an artist, even though I personally find more ability to express with the later. I hate this feeling. Likewise, I believe that many photographers resign themselves to attempting the exact same stylistic approaches to the exact same types of subjects and then burn out after a few years, feeling bored with it. Even if the decision to copy is not a conscious one, I feel that simply being exposed disproportionately to the work that becomes 'most popular' on mainstream photo websites results in a sort of preconceived expectation of what we should do or what is possible, when in fact there are no limitations.
 
It's funny how many photographers I take into the field who simply won't take their camera out of the bag if it isn't a blazing sunset, or who arrive on scene with one shot or one type of shot so firmly ingrained in their minds that they completely ignore all other possibilities. This type of 'tunnel vision', particularly among experienced photographers, is greatly detrimental to progression as an artist and furthermore, the desire to create art in general. Again, mimicry is fine if you're a beginner trying to hone a particular approach or technical challenge, but we have to eventually move beyond that. Last year, I decided I would do almost 12 months of photography at locations where I had never seen any photographs of previously, and the result was a far higher level of enjoyment and deeper relationship with my subjects. At the first moment we see a particular scene, this is when our senses are most in tune, our minds most open and the base for our relationship is built. These first impressions, therefore, are often the ones that are etched most vividly in our minds.
 
Even at times when I find myself photographing the same locations, I always strive to keep an open mind to the potential. There is a favorite quote of mine that reads ''the beginner sees endless possibilities, the master very few''. This is an unfortunate reality for many of us as we become more experienced; but if you look at the entire history of art across all genres you'll find that the young and the less experienced are often the ones who become viewed as visionaries, creators and make the greatest impression upon the viewing public. The key is truly to keep being yourself and to you, yourself, keep evolving and seeking new challenges. When I look back on the best images I've ever taken more than half of all of them came at a location I'd never been, never seen, and didn't see coming until I'd rendered the shot or very shortly before. This goes against a lot of conventional thinking, particularly as it pertains to landscapes, that one must visit the same place dozens of times to get a single image. That mentality runs along the same lines as thinking you must get a certain type of shot just to be popular, or just to do what someone else already did. That mentality corrupts both your artistic thinking and worse yet, the appreciation of the adventure that comes with exploration of nature we all enjoy as landscape artists.
 
I started landscape photography as an outdoor adventure enthusiast, so I look at it from the inside out, and on to what I want to tell the viewer of my experience. I think many others start on the outside and look in, wanting to capture a picture that looks like what they saw on a postcard even if it sacrifices gaining a deeper exploration of the place. The core of being a creative and passionate landscape photographer in the long term and not just a couple years is to appreciate nature enough to want to constantly explore. No explorer wants to go back to the same reflection in the same lake eighteen times to get one shot, particularly when a thousand other people already have a good shot from there. What you are saying by doing this is that you care much more about the popularity of your image than you do about either exploration of the landscape or artistic expression of your experience. So, if you find yourself getting stuck in a rut, keep moving. Give yourself new challenges. Explore. Remember why you started taking pictures. And last, do it for you. Don't listen to who they say you should be. It is such a big, beautiful and amazing world out there it’s impossible to ever run out of inspiration and new possibilities unless that comes from within.
 
Ben van der Sande PRO
12 years ago
Thank's for your thoughts, from an older beginner.
Anna Golitsyna
12 years ago
Beautifully and deeply written, Marc. And I agree with a lot of it. One specific aspect of what you said bothers me for a while and I wonder if you have a comment or an advice.
 
"To define and refine one's own style is the highest level"
and
" Art must evolve, and we must evolve as artists"
 
I see, not for the first time, an inherent contradiction or as a bare minimum tension between these two thoughts. As you refine your style it becomes your master and you become its slave. Your artistic freedom now "must" revolve within potentially very narrow confines of your style, whatever your style is about. Your evolution morphs into existence. Your style becomes the idea that you yourself "have done to death". Of, course "you" here is not personal but a figure of speech.
 
From the history of arts I see two serious solutions only:
 
One is that you disregard that your style confines you. You just work within smaller variations that your style allows. That is the path of most.
 
Another solution is that once in a number of years you change your style, sometimes dramatically. Picasso is a prime example. Avedon is another, when he switched from simple and elegant B&W to quirky and detailed color photographs.
 
Being eclectic, a theoretical third solution, rarely works on a big scale. Cannot even think of an example from art history now.
 
Freedom has its price and self-limitations have their rewards.
 
Anna
P.S. I'll refer this thread in Philosophy of Photography...
 
Robert PRO
12 years ago
Wise words Marc! THX
Marc Adamus
12 years ago
Anna,
 
Thanks for your thoughts. Perhaps I was not as fluent in my thoughts as I could have been, nor did I elaborate as much as I could on specific thoughts. One's style should obviously be evolving if it becomes static or repetitive, as otherwise you just get bored. I don't think that all artists with a refined personal vision are slaves of that vision or work within that restraint, and I could offer numerous examples of that in photography alone. Also, just because one's style evolves does not mean it cannot also be distinctively their own or well refined as their own. I think you can have both, and that is what you see in many great artists who have enjoyed success over long periods.
Anna Golitsyna
12 years ago
Marc,
 
Would give a couple of examples of artists with evolving style (excluding early works)? Yes, I agree that an artist can have more than one distinctively their own styles but normally they are not used in parallel. Normally, one style replaces the previous one.
 
Usually, the style evolves or revolves within its own confines, like the Van Gogh style or the late Picasso oil paintings style.
 
Anna
Marc Adamus
12 years ago
Yes, I understand what you are saying. Perhaps what I meant is that one can have a consistent personal vision that defines them even though their artistic focus might change over many years. Vision and style could almost be used interchangeably, but the core of one's artistic focus can certainly change, and I should have noted a differentiation between artistic focus and style in my previous comments (this post was more hastily written than ideal, I admit).
 
Guy Tal has always made terrific captures of landscapes that are sensitive and contemplative on many levels though his approach has changed from wider angles and bigger views to more intimate views and now to more abstract views. Art Wolfe has always done excitement and action very well while capturing rare moments, but his vision has transferred from wildlife to landscapes to more cultural work over his career. These are subject changes and perhaps even changes in personal interpretation, but not necessarily style changes, and that is what I mean by maintaining a refined personal vision while not being afraid to keep an open mind to what's there.
 
Thanks for making me think about it! I believe at least part of style is innate, and in that sense you could justifiably make the point that we are slaves to it in some way.
Daniel Miroțoi
12 years ago
Hi Marc,
 
like Socrates said ''Know thyself'' or the latin ''nosce te ipsum'' i like to say that life is a permanent search of condition, we search all day a thing, but we don't know what, we don't know what satisfies us, so we experiment different things till we find the thing that satisfies our existance.
 
If we do this thing for money and only for money then our existance is condemned to slavery, i think that a big part of the world population is expierienceing this thing, and they are living absurd, because they don't like what they are doing, i like to think that is better to have a short life with things that you enjoyed doing than a long life with things that you didn't enjoy doing.
 
The masses are in a virtual stage, the tehnology has evolved so much, and the spiritual condition has almost dissapeard, everyone could be a photographer in these days but they are a few who search in their soul, and think about humanity and good things, the other photographers do photographs for popularity, to satisfy their aritstipian thinking that every pleasure is good, this is an absurd way of thinking. I think that we should resolve this problem and take more care of our soul.
 
What has ''art'' to do with all of this ?
 
Well first of all ''art'' is not perfect, ''art'' is not divine, it's just simply a way to connect the physical plan with the metaphysical plan.
If art would be perfect then we can no longer talk about art. I don't see art as an evolution but i see it as a transformation offcourse that an artist evolves on his career from good to bad or from bad to worse but this thing doesen't mean that his art is evolving it's just simply transforming, from clasical to modernism from modernism to contemporary but this thing doesen't mean that we have evolved in something, i' m a little pessimist with this word, ''evolution'' because human society hasn't evolved, we are dealing with lots and lots of antropological problems, like wars, murders etc. We have to think more about each other, if my neighbour has a bigger house then mine this doesen't mean that i have to build a bigger house then his to impress him or her, i have to work more for my soul and to become human, because we forgot how to act like humans.
 
Piet Flour PRO
12 years ago
very interesting input Marc; and others
Marie-Claude PRO
12 years ago
Hi Marc,
I couldn't agree more !
I'm a begginner of course but I do share your ideas especiallythose :
 
"This type of 'tunnel vision', particularly among experienced photographers, is greatly detrimental to progression as an artist and furthermore, the desire to create art in general. Again, mimicry is fine if you're a beginner trying to hone a particular approach or technical challenge, but we have to eventually move beyond that."
 
I like those words"tunnel vision" you are right this is what we should try to avoid even if the temptation is big ;-)
 
And here is the part I agree the more with you :
 
"The key is truly to keep being yourself "
Being oneself, take the photos you like, take them for yourself not to please anybody else !
 
I enjoyed reading your words :-)
 
MC
Robert PRO
12 years ago
Hello Marc, inspired by your words, and normally i do not write much for such topics, i had another thinking which following me for a very long time.
 
For my purpose, means the main reason why i took out my camera again and why i started to make my hobby so intense till professional training with an degree is more a way of a self development than becoming famous. My personal adjustment towards all things i do and especially for my hobby which consumes most of my free time is to develop. Soon i reached the awareness that without changes the development stops. The same is "ignoring developments" makes me stop developing my self. Also a certain role plays the own ego which is our all biggest enemy. Aware of this and opening my heart for new things along with my capability to accept and to learn new things makes me moving forward.
 
In my professional world the same is happen, new developments coming up, new engineers with new ideas come up and new solutions come up. I see people fighting against changes and new developments and recognized they afraid to pic up challenges because their ego stops them. I could now write more examples but leave this now as i think you will understand.
 
Now seeing this and many other examples it is clear that i only can agree with you and suggest to everybody: Don't stand in your own way, don't ignore trends but also don't believe them, open your eyes for new things and let some old things behind to make space for the new, let art grow in your self and materialize your visions ……. and so on.
 
Be the one who make things happen and not the one who just wait for others who make the things happen.
 
My very much appreciated and valued mentor says to me at the beginning "love what you do more than your self and with the right patience you will succeed"
Marc Adamus
12 years ago
Thanks for your input, Robert. Very nicely explained and thanks for the additional quotes which I appreciate hearing and are very true.
Bragi Ingibergsson - BRIN PRO
12 years ago
 
The core of being a creative and passionate landscape photographer in the long term and not just a couple years is to appreciate nature enough to want to constantly explore. No explorer wants to go back to the same reflection in the same lake eighteen times to get one shot, particularly when a thousand other people already have a good shot from there. What you are saying by doing this is that you care much more about the popularity of your image than you do about either exploration of the landscape or artistic expression of your experience. So, if you find yourself getting stuck in a rut, keep moving. Give yourself new challenges. Explore.
 
 
Marc, thank you very much for your contribution here in the landscape forum; your thoughts arouse my interest and I can agree with a lot of your points. I especially like your quoted words which are a great encouragement.
 
In the beginning of June a new feature will be implemented in the landscape group; a special tab for articles. I would appreciate if I might put your article in there when it has been carried out.
 
Bragi
Marie-Ancolie Romanet
12 years ago
as a permanent beginner, I read everything with a great interest.
and I am grateful to all of you.
 
What makes me happy among other sentences is this from Robert
 
"Don't stand in your own way, don't ignore trends but also don't believe them, open your eyes for new things and let some old things behind to make space for the new, let art grow in your self and materialize your visions ……. and so on.
 
Be the one who make things happen and not the one who just wait for others who make the things happen. "
 
maybe everything you (all) wrote can be related to this sentence from Vincent Van Gogh : "​​
If you hear a voice within you say "you can not paint", then by all means paint and that voice will be silented"
 
Deleted User
12 years ago
 
What makes me happy among other sentences is this from Robert
 
"Don't stand in your own way, don't ignore trends but also don't believe them, open your eyes for new things and let some old things behind to make space for the new, let art grow in your self and materialize your visions ……. and so on.
 
Be the one who make things happen and not the one who just wait for others who make the things happen. "
 
 
And I would add, not substitute, but add:
 
Open your eyes for old things and let some new things behind to make space for the old
 
This is often of equal benefit and enrichment.
Marie-Ancolie Romanet
12 years ago
Clyde, this is a wonderful add.