1x.com - The last one switch off the light by acrux/Kowalkowski Rafal

Photos Artists Forum Tutorials Critique Books Buy Prints About

Stumble 1X

Tour

Join

Sign in

The last one switch off the light

Related photos

Write

Nikolay Shopov 4 months ago

Beautiful!

carlito babyboy 1 year ago

wowwwwww :)

MARK TAYLOR 2 years ago

i would like a copy of this, can you email me and we will sort out a price

markharrogate@hotmail.com

Cheron 2 years ago

Stergios 2 years ago

Great picture and title :-)

jalili 2 years ago

What a beautiful .................

Niels Christian Wulff 2 years ago

This is truly amazing, love it :-)))
/Wulff

aulia rahman 2 years ago

awesome..amazing...gosh.. great detail you have there... thanks for share this pic, i can enjoy it even when im going to close the day..;)

Ralf Stelander 2 years ago

Cool photo and really clever title too!

pouya saadat 2 years ago

it's realy amazing

Morteza Karimi 2 years ago

there's so much more variety of color in this shot than we expect from a sunset.
and the title is cool ;D

Al Sheihk 2 years ago

I don't know what I liked most !! your fine capture or your great title ?
Great,this is a page I learned from.
Best regards.

martin zalba 2 years ago

F A N T A S T I C !! regards

Darmal Ali 2 years ago

amazing view.... love it :)

LuMaX 2 years ago

nice scene

xeal 2 years ago

Great picture !

Edy Santosa 2 years ago

Great!!! ;)

igorartmd 2 years ago

superbe

Anne Ueland 2 years ago

Wow, Awesome shot :)

Henry Adam 2 years ago

wow.. very nice

Ramdani 2 years ago

Wow, what an astonishing scenery...awesome!

Nicolas Marino 2 years ago

Simply Amazing!!!

Marc Benslahdine 2 years ago

Great one!

sammy 2 years ago

Great...

acrux 2 years ago

Yes, it is really pleasure to be in this gallery after 6 months "rejection time"

Morkel Erasmus 2 years ago

this is too good for words. big congrats!!

Dragan M. Babovic 2 years ago

Great landscape and comparation of one big mounatin and small figure of man.

Pierre Pageau 2 years ago

félicitations .

Andy Kämpf 2 years ago

incredible colors and light! the POV is amazing...

:)

ragnar 2 years ago

It does not look natural to me. The light and shadows on the ground does not match the position of the sun.

acrux The sun is exactly at the place where it was. I don't tell you what is a false or true here but I assure you that I know where the things should be. I don't like under exposed parts in this kind pf photography, so I really sorry that I used this means what you see.

kregon 2 years ago

perfedt ligth and image!
regards, egon

Magda Berny 2 years ago

amazing view... slightly terrifies me, yet I am afraid of height...

Bernadette Heemskerk 2 years ago

Incredible shot!

Amnon Eichelberg 2 years ago

amazing

pen 2 years ago

this is edited heavily though right? i'm having a hard time believing that the man was on the original shot. if not, i'd put this in creative edit not landscape.

acrux for me it is digital section so I don't see really difference between landscape and creative here. only nature division says that no photo editing should be applied. so all HDR images should be in creative category.

pen so you believe that high-dinamyc-range images should be in creative edit? that doesn't really make sense because it's still a photo of a landscape, as u saw it- with enhanced dynamics.
but i was asking if you pasted in the man in the photo, if u did that is not the photo u took so that's why i would put this in creative edit, i hope you understand.

acrux I don't believe - I know. Show me where on this website it had been said - landscape is a category where you can not apply digital manipalution. I hope you are familiar with PSA regulations about NAture divisione ( I am a member and taking part in PSA exhibitions).
"?Nature Photography is restricted to the use of the photographic process to depict observations from all branches of natural history, except anthropology and archeology, in such a fashion that a well informed person will be able to identify the subject material and certify as to its honest presentation. The story telling value of a photograph must be weighed more than the pictorial quality. Human elements shall not be present, except on the rare occasion where those human elements enhance the nature story. The presence of scientific bands on wild animals is acceptable. Photographs of artificially produced hybrid plants or animals, mounted specimens, or obviously set arrangements, are ineligible, as is any form of manipulation that alters the truth of the photographic statement. No elements may be moved, cloned, added, deleted, rearranged or combined. No manipulation or modification is permitted except sharpening, resizing, cropping, selective lightening or darkening, and restoration of original color to the scene. No special effects filters can be applied. Any adjustments must appear natural.?

So on this website the landscape doesn't mean "nature" and for me is more landscape than creative even the object has been before or not. I hope you understand now.

pen yeah.. whatever, i'm increasingly more observant that you do not want to answer my question.. i don't care what it looked like when u saw it because through camera and post production you made it look what u saw it like! correct? i merely asked if the person that does indeed enhance the image, it almost makes it to be honest, was on the original or was he pasted, modificated or should i say added into the photo later on?

acrux There is no need to answer that question because you are not a jury , this is not competition and I am not feel responsible to answer whatsoever. Try to be not "observer" but do the same or similiar to have photo published. I will not care what kind of means you use when I see the final product as long as that will be not a nature category.

If you want to know the secret I tell you that I've been thinking about this for a half a year. Many similiar have been rejected from this island amd you can find them on my website.

pen yeah, i couldn't care less about being published at the moment, i will always shoot at a certain style, if it doesn't fit 1x - fine. but it's fairly obvious the person was not in the shot and that's all i wanted to know, thanks a bunch!

acrux Many people say that - our pictures don't fit 1x and when I read this it makes me laugh. Not even one?? So sorry. I see it in different way that probably it is something wrong with your account, maybe it is a fake bacause you afraid to write something under your real face (how in screening process).

You shouldn't be so sure...The obvious thing is only one - you and me die and those people who have been on the crater with me as well.