Mine was published in a week 

The longest was about 15 days and it got published afterwards

Good luck in screening :) 

Alexander

but i have a question

in old 1x we when we posted photo to screening...it has status "waiting for screening"...and in this time we could have deleted the work if something was wrong....

now i see that if i upload a photo to selection i can not delete it ...

or maybe we can...and i just don't know where ?

it would be really nice if we could still remove our work before it is  "in scrrening"

My first published work took 3 days, just when my membership was in 5 day old, very surprising. once I got 3 photos published in a day, very unbelievable. Another photo was published after more than 3 weeks.

However, some photos are rejected and more disappointing, it took more than 2 weeks and without any comment. I mentioned above.

Screening/selection time is really an issue now. My real work is dealing with vendor management, to ensure their deliverable, and I don't want the increasing of their clients will impact to their deliverable to me. I knew it's too extreme to compare, but my suggestion is, 1x should stick to maximum screening time, say 2 weeks. It means, the currators must take decission. Otherwise my photo in selection will stack and many more from other members, and at the end, the currators will never end up with is. My worry is, they lose their energy and reject great photo.

Hope this is considerated. 

Another suggestion is to add the number of currators (common action indeed :D)

I would agree if it applies to all members or decided by the team/owner. This idea is to minimize the stacks of waiting photos on the selection process, because the number of them will increase since everyone have at least 1 slot per week while the selection process is slower than that. It's just like cases in the court. We can imagine for member with 5 and 10 slots or more. 

This maximum selection time limit is just an idea to manage the work load balance, so the 1x team can spend more time for critiques, forum, or perhaps events/activities/workshopes etc which more educating for members.

Anyhow  I dont really know for sure your and team's load. Just guessing. 

Maybe it's not the right topic to discuss, so you can drop or ignore it of course. 

Still waiting for my first photo to get accepted :)

1. bad photo: max 4 days to get rejected. I got recently 2 days.

2. good photo: in range of 4-7 days to get published.

3. so-so photo: goes to voting

in this voting process, will depends on voting result. 

a. if many members like the photo, then curator will consider to publish it.

b. if more people doesn't like the photo, the curator will give chance for the photo to get better score from member. this makes our photo hanging there for more than 2 weeks. longer means bad. but still it has chance to get published.

I am sure with this process.

this took 4 weeks

the rest of my published work were published within 2-3 weeks.

but I agree with everyone that the screening process take very long, and for those who has been waiting for so long, and got rejected without any comment is very painful.