(I guess this comment never reach it's destination. A pity, because I meant it.)

I got
"is he wearing pink?!? LOL!"
to this one
http://www.onexposure.net/?viewpic=12794
:)
I have a feeling I know who left that comment... ;)

My particular fav comment on one of mine was "I would delete this from my card"...... lol

Hmmmm. Sounds like something I would have said. It could have been a little more constructive, eh ? :)))))

Not at all!! I loved it.. :) altough.. made me a bit unsure about my manhood.. :( LoL!

LOL!!! Only the manliest of men can pull off pink underwear, Ilja. No worries there. :))))

LOL!!! Only the manliest of men can pull off pink underwear, Ilja. No worries there. :))))

Double bluff I recon!........

Well, any color would be nice :-)

Double bluff I recon!........

Damn it pal!!
I was just getting my self-esteem back..
:)

...yeah! I'm sure my beets have a story, but they ain't talkin....

"Contrived?

Hehe, with comments like that I would like a respond option! lol

that is the gayest punch ever

I received this comment to a recent rejected image- really mad me mad! :)

"I dont understand it at all.. I cant make anything out of it, im sorry"

very cool Tom ;)

best comment I had on one of my photos in screening. Made me feel... insignificant lol

LOL !
Blesss your cotton socks!

"Not happy about the colour and the composition is not to my taste and I really don't like the subject material but I like the picture"

Recently in screening I read the following that amused me.
"Not happy about the colour and the composition is not to my taste and I really don't like the subject material but I like the picture"

On this picture:

I got this comment:

"...this is an awesome photo but the dog looks like he's got a gas mask on. other than that, its impeccable."

It made the rejection a bit more bearable :-)

I get this comment often:
"Another weird one"

"If you don't publish this photo I will kill you -the crew- all one by one"

it raised a smile to!.....

yeap! it was 100% voted against! So death threats are taken very seriously by the crew! We lost a lot of sleep over it!.....

Any special Method of Execution, you prefer?

But I won't eat you.

Death by HDR

but cut our heads off and photograph us as our spirit leaves?

ah the head? hmm..The spirit of monkeys leaves from their tail and not from the head

true! The crew monkey's have no need of a head as they are deaf, blind and will not talk! but spare the tail, we need to click the random reject button with something!

lol!!!

I will bring some chimpanzees as new screeners.

Mal is the HDR dead angel. And he didn't reply ;-)

Kaveh H. Steppenwolf wrote (click for original post):
I will bring some chimpanzees as new screeners.

We got one! Alexandre!

huh.

A comment on my latest lensbaby rejected one...
"Check out some outstanding lensbaby work with Codrin Lupei (An artist here)"

A comment on my latest lensbaby rejected one...
"Check out some outstanding lensbaby work with Codrin Lupei (An artist here)"

Already checked it...:))))))

what it is?

I think the perspective is not right

i dont see the connection between the two worlds...

I don't see the connection...

The single Breast has no connection to the rest of the body

Really ???
Oh my God...I can't believe!!!!!!

:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

This is becoming a very depressing topic...

This is becoming a very depressing topic...

I've got this one too...deep and careful photographic analysis
Afrika

I not like title

Really...I'm not joking.
:-((

I tend to disagree with many of the remarks regarding the "I not like title" feedback on Barbara's photo. I think the person commenting was being quite serious with his remark, and - assuming he was - has the right to dismiss a photo if he thinks the (in his/her eyes) bad choice of a title seriously undermines the value of the picture. Often titles are given to pictures to steer viewers, to help the photo. And sometimes a good title can actually do just that. So you have to accept that a badly chosen title can also turn against you, that it can be the other way around just as well. Once you decide to include a title, that title becomes part of the photo, and just like any other part, the 'title' part can help the photo, or can ruin it (the viewing experience), and be ground for dismissal.

Maybe we post because the large, very large majority of member screeners are not idiots at all and give very rasonable, polite, consciencious critics in screening, Lars. Or i´m wrong ? :-)

Has anyone considered that the person stating "I don't like the title" actually might have voted for the picture to be published and just did not like the title?

And the correct photographic preparation for to do it.(

How about this: (a real movie title)
"Don't Worry, We'll Think of a Title"

hey Patricia, can i steal it :-) ,,, Please ;-)

Have you ever realised how stupid the title "Star Wars" is? LOL.

So what ?..

Anyway: would you say Zottegem or Aarschot are bad places just because their name is... eh, funny? :)

A trivial pas de deux IMO! :-( (Lars Klottrup) What is trivial in here,Lars?

Sorry, this thread is only for fun member screening comments.
I have seen, that you have deleted me as a friend. Thin skin? :-)

Thank you Lars for taking the time to give long feedbacks, but as they are always negative and you're a part of the crew, sure none of my images will be published soon... Also, I'm curious to know if you see the name of the authors.

Thank you Lars for taking the time to give long feedbacks, but as they are always negative and you're a part of the crew, sure none of my images will be published soon... Also, I'm curious to know if you see the name of the authors.

i dont think the crew can see the name of the autor. but since we know each others work and graphical language pretty well we (or at least I) can tell pretty sure in screening which one is a Legrand, a Huttinski and so on).

Yes, you're right about to recognize the style of somebody ;-)
But the crew see the names of the authors.

oh do they, why is that?

Could be a zoo!

Moderators are not a part of the crew.

It's a typical product of the technology and not a photographer.
Look how good pictures our Nikon ( Canon, Pentax, Olympus ???) is doing !

"There are too many details that stand out, these detract from the symmetry of the image."

Written to an image where no symmetry can be found:

Sharing such comments on Friday afternoon after a long and tiring week is plain cruelty to animals... anyone got an aspirin?

Some Duvels will work better... ;)

# just a library, not much interesting to my eyes, sorry...
# Great idea!
# It is just a picture of a bookshelf, nothing more.
# Original!

Is it true about the "Duvel Challenge"? :)

"The reason I really dislike photos like this is because, some people are so insensitive that they cannot see the photos they take are really denigrating poor people."

Congratulations to the screener (I think I know who that was). This is the biggest bullshit I ever had the misfortune to read under one of my photos.

Give me a break, Lars.

Just too much... Is it possible for you to be a bit more reasonable? Just a bit, please....

It's a typical product of the technology and not a photographer.
Look how good pictures our Nikon ( Canon, Pentax, Olympus ???) is doing !

I promise I'll try to stop zooming with a fixed focal lens next time! :)

I just took this as an example for many other comments shown here in this thread. So don't take it personal. On the one hand people complain about missing feedback, but if they receive one, it seems to be hard to accept it if it not matches the own photo standards and taste.

Anyway, sorry for writing this here...I though it could be funny! :(

You know, I am German, so nothing is funny for me. :-)

/Stephan

make a voting decision on the site with "best photos on the web" :).

You know, I am German, so nothing is funny for me. :-)
/Stephan

maybe it*s the city Stephen

There is nothing more exciting than to look over the muddy sugar-beet fields in one of Hannovers suburbs on a grey rainy day. I can't understand, why to blame the city. :-)
/Stephan

The last time I read the thread on funny comments it was quite some time ago. At first I felt relieved that I was not the only one receiving the comments, but then I realized that maybe I had made some terrible ones without knowing it. So, I simply stopped writing comments!

Reading these new comments, I have to admit I don't find them funny - oh okay maybe a little funny - but really what it mostly shows is that people are not looking at the pictures very carefully at all. Actually it makes me wonder just what they are looking at?

Of those above - the best example of this for me is Balazs's shot of the kids. The smiles on their faces tell me they are very happy children who are actually enjoying themselves. They look as happy as my own children once looked in photos when they were young. So, my thought is that the person writing what they did - did not look at the photograph. Maybe they saw foreign kids from ?? and immediately projected onto the image their own POV about taking pictures of poor kids.. But they never looked at those children - in his picture..not really. If they had written,
"I cannot vote for this photo because the children have big smiles and seem too happy" that I could accept. At least I would understand that they had looked at the photo!!!

I wish I could laugh like Faddoush....until then I will just keep shaking my head in disbelief.

Phyllis

About the picture"In the night all the cats are black"
nothing clearly recognizable here. But even if abstract, not much impact/interetingness

Concerning Swiss citizenship: Could also be the chocolate, the low taxes or the funny accent.

Or the opportunity to make money in pharmaceuticals.

Stephan Sünderkamp wrote (click for original post):
Concerning Swiss citizenship: Could also be the chocolate, the low taxes or the funny accent.

"boring and painfully clinical"

Rejected.

But this one - quite similar -and as well boring and painfully clinical:


Published

1X at it's best, I think ;-)

well I have to agree with the first comment, that photo is rather boring and hard to look at

Comments from members during screening

i vote for because im a mini owner haha ;)

Remember that this is a thread about fun member screening comments and not a place to discuss rejected images.

Please stick to the topic and do not discuss rejected images or anything else except the topic!

Please accept my apology.

In reality it was made from a moving car on a straight paved road in the town of Grand Forks, BC

Not on 1x, but one of my favourite ever member comments on another site was "I'd hang this in my bathroom".
That was probably 4 years ago, and I still can't work out whether it was a compliment or not!

"The shape of the blur suggest they are going around a bend but the ground looks like ice. I feel uneasy about their safety. Voted for."

"the 345244263547756746377th sunset on the site. by the way what about the jet trails? weren't they considered a bad photographic "etiquette"??"

"The shape of the blur suggest they are going around a bend but the ground looks like ice. I feel uneasy about their safety. Voted for."

Remo, is a basic rule when you have water/liquid surfaces in a photo, if wather surface is not right leveled, give us impression all will end in a big flood ...  iīm not  rule freack in photography but this one rarely works when it is broken :)