I tried to upload a nude today and clicked "Yes, this photo contains nude content". When I tried to save an error message appeared: "you must fill in if your photo contains nude content". I did it agan and again and the error message kept popping up. After a while I gave up, marked it as "no nude content" and this time the system saved the changes. Marked like this, I sent it to screening.
When I open the photo in my overview page, the nude content options are blank. I click again on "contains nude content" and the same error message appears.

This makes me sad and gives suicidical thoughts. Why, why, why is this happening to me?

Balazs...maybe is not nude enough :)))

It's Capa's spirit punishing you for not sticking on documentary photography ;)

That's actually a good question Ricky - what is nude enough to be filtered? In my case it was a back nude, meaning no breasts etc only the back and buttocks half-covered. If Jacob's Skynet is able to see if a nude is explicit enough or not he deserves the programmers' Nobel prize. But if not, my question still remains...

I can't explain the error messages Balazs but I can confirm that you had put it in FAN, or at at least that is the category displayed. mal

Thanks Mal. The fine art bug usually means that something definitely NOT nude ends up in that category. First time I see it happen vice versa.

I had the same thing Balazs. the site seems to register though what you first mark. just disregard the reappearing of the blank fields afterwards.

Thanks to you all for your input.

This is not a bug Balazs - skynet represents advanced AI and knows that nude pictures of you belong in humour NOT "fine art" nude :))

I can't laugh here, really. Seeing my self-nudes popping up on gay sites and blogs is not as funny as it sounds.

my friend you became a celebrity :)

Hee-hee:)))) Balazs on gay sites....hee-hee.
Photoshop a hard hat onto your head...I can see you up on canteens walls at construction sites.
....sorry...but this is a really funny diversion for a change

Found it... http://www.lowcostprints.com/pictures/hi/bt5999.jpg

yummie
:-)

balazs is far prettier than this poof

Never met Balazs, but George Costanza is not a poof!